India Broadband Forum Feed


Huawei K4505, UMG1831 Heating More Than E156, E1750, E1752. Why??

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 11:57 AM PST

I wont say tht its excessive heating. But its more heater when compare to 7.2 Mbps and 3.6 Mbps modems.


Transportation Security Administration

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 11:41 AM PST


'Like' functionality trouble

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 11:36 AM PST

how much work is required? :)

---------- Post added at 01:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:03 AM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by arunodayt View Post
Okay, I was a bit hasty there. It is still not working for me - I don't know why it worked the last time.

Does Firefox 4 beta have any significant problems? I think I will try it, and not just for the 'Like' button ;)

recent beta builds have been pretty solid imo.

---------- Post added at 01:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:04 AM ----------

though some addons might not work rightaway. so that is a possible reason not to switch.

---------- Post added at 01:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:04 AM ----------

i do believe that it is mostly connected to some addon you might be running that is blocking the related scripts.


Hayai Broadband Hardware Details

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 11:09 AM PST

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazysah View Post
Can't you give it to someone in india to send it in for you?

Uh... how would that make a difference? The forms and copies of this that and the other thing still have to be stamped in this country by your consulate and/or a notary. If it were possible I'd have sent already filled out and sent all the papers back with my Mrs in August when she last visited NZ. Half the time I don't even get sent the papers until a few days after the lawyers receive confirmation that a certain step is completed.


MTNL Broadband 2 MBPS Unlimited @ 599/month

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 11:02 AM PST

Any good news from MTNL NewDelhi ?


WikiLeaks Cablegate

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 10:55 AM PST

Quote:

Originally Posted by amish View Post
Saddam cud have done this and that.. now again.. u r putting up ur own theories...

These aren't my theories. Leave aside where they came from, just try and test it instead. see how well it stands up. Sign of a good theory is it explains more and can withstand robust questioning.

Quote:

Originally Posted by amish View Post
even after capture of Saddam and his death.. i dont recall remember anywhere where news has surfaced that Saddam actually funded terrorists.

Nope, no evidence that he supported any terrorists whatsoever.

I said think as if you were in 2002 not 2006 or 2010. At the time if your job was to take a call given what happened on 9-11 what would you have done. The administration was under pressure to make sure it never happened again. You need to send a message out to those that would want to commit many 9-11's if given the chance.

You have to look at this from an american perspective and a republican one at that. BBC or CNN are not going to give you that picture. And forget about our media.

26-11 is a little example of whats possible if you get pro's involved in planning an attrocity. Imagine the same with Saddams help anywhere US interests are involved. Who would they go after, he'd be picking at them from different spots and they would have no clue. They did not want to wait for this scenario to unfold, they went ahead and pre-empted it.

The problem you have with this is simple, no WMD, no evidence of terrorism etc. therefore how could the attack be justified. Would Saddam have done it. Not the right questions, does not even matter. All it requires is for the US to believe its plausible and it was very plausible in 2002 and they get the guns out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by amish View Post
And u think this all has stopped after Saddam??

All 'this' means what to you ?

'This' to me means Iraq was made an example of, any country that tries to attack US interests will face the same. Because 9-11 signalled the beginning of 'open season' on the US or her interests.

Why all that talk about terrorism since, getting everybody on the same page. With us or against us, does that make more sense now :)

How many attacks have they been on US interests since 9-11. Not a single one. All the idiots that would do this got sucked into Iraq & Afghanistan where they got their asses handed to them. So they got to fight the US in another country and lost. Do you see how they got played. Do you see how the idea that anyone can do a 9-11 got countered.

So maye 'this' might not have stopped entirely but its had a lot of blood drained out of it since 9-11. 'This' is weaker today than it was just after 9-11.

Quote:

Originally Posted by amish View Post
The real terrorism is all via Pakistan.. and USA knows it well... and still not doing anything.

Because Pakistan dare not try anything against the US. And that should tell you a thing or two, the US only cares about terrorism on its interests FIRST.

Pakistan is OUR problem not an american problem. We have to come up with our own ways to deal with it, not expect US to sort it out for us. That is why the US is 'not doing anything'.

Quote:

Originally Posted by amish View Post
If terrorism was reason behind attacking Saddam then Pak shud have come first in list.

They don't have the motive or the determination that Saddam would have had. The man was kicked out of Kuwait and sanctioned for 12 years so his army was weaker and he had no nukes. In short a much easier target and one good enough to make a point to the whole world.

Quote:

Originally Posted by amish View Post
But no.. there is nothing in Pakistan that USA wants (read oil)...thats why its not taking any action against Pak.

There was no oil in Afghanistan either, yet they still went there.

---------- Post added December 10th, 2010 at 12:25 AM ---------- Previous post was December 9th, 2010 at 11:56 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by auroraPWN View Post
ROFLMAO blr_p get your facts right....

LOL away :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by auroraPWN View Post
how the hell did Saddam Hussein hurt the interests of america? apart from running a troubled dictatorship he was not the one training terrorists and sending them to america..

The question isn't how he hurt them, but rather how he could or will hurt them in the future if ignored.

Training terrorists is not required when he has his armed forces, real pro's not amateurs or wannabe's.

He does not have to send them to america, he could send them anywhere in the world where US has interests.

Quote:

Originally Posted by auroraPWN View Post
Well as a matter of fact i do not support the oil-theory because there is no reason and logic behind it .

Good.

Quote:

Originally Posted by auroraPWN View Post
1. wiki cablegates revealed that most of the terrorist funding comes from the Saudi Arab countries. I am pretty sure if wikileaks knows this NSA must have known this from the starting of terrorism... then why does not america wage a war against the Sheikhs sitting in those countries.

And its been well known that Saudi's as in personal contributions by citizens for whatever cause rather than the state itself has been doing this for a long time.

The Sheiks cannot defend their own country without running crying to the west for help. They purposely keep their armed forces weak despite buying billions in toys because they are afraid of a coup. Therefore the Saudi's & other gulf arabs represent ZERO risk to the US. They're a harmless people :D

The Iraqi's otoh are a much tougher, smarter people. I would describe Iraq as the Germany of the gulf when it comes to the ability of her people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by auroraPWN View Post
As far as the terrorists i have one way to disprove your theory...

It's not my theory. But you can try your best to take shots at it :)

Do try again and the challenge is open to anyone btw.


TRAI to come out with recommendations on National BroadBand Plan

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 10:35 AM PST

This new TRAI recommendations disappoints me.


Big tv hd dvr vs tata

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 10:25 AM PST

yep there package rates are cheap and no additional cost other than specified in their website


Is BSNL fooling customers in the name of Mobile TV ?

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 10:17 AM PST

Ya, I think it's true. There won't be any extra charges if you subscribe month-to-month. You need to get this confirmed from some reliable source. Try that BSNL website. You might find some useful info there.


Airtel home delivered a prepaid sim card to my place!

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 10:15 AM PST

well i feel like an idiot now. i discovered that a shady looking shop was selling airtel and vodafone prepaid sims for 15 rupees in the nearby market.

(i remember taking an IDEA sim from them earlier this year. that connection had stopped working after a week. Parents confirmed that no one had come to verify my address... So probably that was the reason).

---------- Post added at 11:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:44 PM ----------

i should mention it here for the sake of it. i know this is not something airtel offers. i know that they probably did it as a favor to me because i have been very critical of them online. i only decided to publish this thread after they tweeted about the same.

http://twitter.com/#!/Airtel_Presenc...98539776131073

i had no plans to publish it because it would not have been a nice thing to do.


YouTube now has legal hindi movies online!

Posted: 09 Dec 2010 10:13 AM PST

Amish.....

i think there are many such apps!!

but its good to hear this news!!