India Broadband Forum Feed

Asianet Digital TV Added 11 Channels

Posted: 12 Dec 2012 01:12 PM PST

Asianet Digital TV Today Added 11 New Channels Including 3 Blank Channels

124 Blank
143 Blank
148 Blank
206 Zee Tamil
244 TV9 Kannada
409 NG Wild
431 Zee Business
432 News 9
515 Zee Salam
527 Zee News
550 Zee Zing

Also following channel numbers were changed

New LCN

144 Kiran
145 kairali We
146 Yes Indiavision
147 Medley

Asus RT N13U router with reliance broadband?

Posted: 12 Dec 2012 12:53 PM PST

Alright. Here is what you can do, the next time sites stop loading, first ping the asus router, and then the reliance router, if both pings go through with no packet loss or very high latencies, your router should be alright. For me, it'd not be able to ping the bsnl modem sometimes, firmware update solved that.

MTNL 3G Jadoo Experiences and Issues

Posted: 12 Dec 2012 12:35 PM PST

Quote:
Originally Posted by x720 View Post
All this drama got me curious, ported back into mtnl :p
Hehe so something good happened

BSNL Broadband BBG Combo UL 2150 in Gurgaon (175GB at 4mbps)

Posted: 12 Dec 2012 12:29 PM PST

The YOU setup, I'd seen at my friend's place had a co-ax terminating into a Motorola cable modem. Are you getting the cat5 cable directly from you, rather than coax ?


EDIT

Of course, the core would be copper, if that is what you're referring to.

New Amazing Reliance Broadband Thunder Plans

Posted: 12 Dec 2012 12:15 PM PST

Quote:
Originally Posted by goyal.sanchit View Post
Piratebay seems to be down. Otherwise also I have had issues accessing piratebay using automatic dns. Anyone else noticed same problem?
Piratebay isn't opening up for me either. Is the site down or its Reliance specific?

EDIT: Never mind - http://torrentfreak.com/aargh-the-pi...s-down-121212/

Funny Images and Jokes Thread

Posted: 12 Dec 2012 11:54 AM PST

iPhone = Eye Phone = Illuminati Phone. Siri spelled backwards is Iris, that's a part of the Eye. Apple is Illuminati. They are watching you.:D

Source: https://twitter.com/MindbIowingFact/...32408458440704

Automated Login System for Reliance Broadband?

Posted: 12 Dec 2012 11:10 AM PST

I installed the app to check it. However since I have increased the dpi in my Laptop the app opens like this-



Can you correct this? Or tell what are the options at the right side of application? I can decrease the dpi and check but that is a tedious process! :D

Does God Exist?

Posted: 12 Dec 2012 10:56 AM PST

Quote:
Originally Posted by dheerajsp View Post
Mmmm... actually you DID shift the burden of proof. You asked the question, and I quote, "has this been proved that everything doesn't really need a creator? Do u have any experiment to prove this?".
Shifting of proof means without giving a proof myself, i ask u to get one. I didnt do that. The proof is there for all to see - nothing happens without a phenomena by a creator, or a creator.

Quote:
Oh, and you DID say "creator"(post #2781). Now you're just lying.
That was for the Laws of the Universe? Did i say Universe is created by God, or that the growth on the bread was done by God. No. Dont mince with my words.

Quote:
Also, you're being very unwise in rejecting the possibility that it's out there for no reason.(2) That's as foolish as some atheists rejecting the existence of god completely.(1)
(1) Well, u r actually rejecting right now, any sort of existence of that order. So i believe u r a part of those "Some" Atheists?
(2) Coz, i dont have any reason to believe in that! It has to be proved that these laws came out of nothing. Make a lab, try doing some experiments & create a law out of pure vacuum. Share ur results with us.

Quote:
That question is irrelevant. You just admitted that a creator is not necessary for everything.
The ultimate, for everything is a creator. If water starts getting lighter as it solidifies, then thats anomolous behaviour of water. And that behaviour, is due to the properties of its constituents. And the constituents got these properties out of thin air? Oh sorry, out of vacuum? U mean to say that the properties of the elements came out of vacuum?

Quote:
Also, that question is malformed. By asking "who", you are rejecting any naturalistic explanation that doesn't involve a creator.
Its simple - if there is a scientific law pursuant to which all these laws were formed, then my question wud shift to "Who created that 1 law?" So end result will hint towards a creator.

Quote:
The answer I've found is that the concept of god was created by man for several reasons. Some of them being to unite humans, to establish authority, to explain the unknown, and most importantly, to comfort the fear and finality of death. That's why almost every religion claims there is an afterlife. A claim which I personally feel is BS.

Why should I read the Gita and why should I believe what it says? In fact, why believe ANY holy scripture?

I agree with you regarding evidence. But god never shows evidence. He expects us to have faith in his revelations. Faith in him. If god dealt with evidence, then there would be no need for this thread.
These comments smell badly of the dogma u live in, and the rigidness in accepting new things. U just think that what u have heard about religion, is all exactly contained in the scriptures. And to change this very view, u shud read the books. Who said they are Holy? Ur parents? Who told them? Their parents? Who told their parents? Parents of their parents?
So a "Supposed Atheist" actually believes that his parents, and his ancestors knew everything in & out? Without even bothering to find out the reality?

I m sorry to say, but thats not an Atheist. An Atheist examines the evidences on his own - without any bias & then comes to a decision. Here, u r not examining all the evidences, and u r not free of any bias. So u r not an Atheist. U r actually behaving like Govind Namdeo in OMG right now......

Quote:
My response to you was not regarding 'everything', but regarding the fundamental particle in the universe. The way you asked that question seemed like you would propose god as the reason why that particle came into existence.
Thats y i say - dont assume anything. U r assuming too many things, without examining the evidences at ur perusal. U assume that what ur parents say about the scriptures is right. U assume that when they say its "Holy", it becomes religious.

Quote:
But my point is: forget about that particle or how it came into existence. Can you prove that god; a supernatural entity which is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent and omni-benevolent actually exists?
Actually that long "omni-sequence" u gave, i believe is hinting to Higgs - Boson. U have always heard these things. But u never tried to dig deeper & find the true meaning of that sentence. The Higss Boson is ur fundamental particle that gives mass to matter. And the fundamental particle of the matter is thought to be conscious these days - research is on in that direction.

Quote:
I don't see why I need to know what came before the big bang or the need to know every bit of info in the universe to make any judgement regarding the claim of a god.
U have voided the definition of an Atheist ab-initio over here.

Quote:
Again, you're asking the wrong question. Assuming that a "master programmer" created the laws is absurd.
And assuming that everything came out of vacuum, is not?

Quote:
You didn't. But if you applied the same method of reasoning(that a much complex universe certainly can't be built without a programmer), then you should be compelled to ask the question "Who created god?". But this will lead to an infinite regression. Which is why I think the proposition that 'anything complex has a creator' is not ideal to find out the cause of the universe. Which is one of the reasons why I don't believe in the concept of a god.
WOW!!! To avoid a difficult question, u chose the easier way? Remember, a True Atheist has to go to the right questions, and not avoid them, thinking that they are going into infinite regression - another assumption. May be, someday u will find answer to that as well, if u start searching in that direction.

And for that matter, may be if the Scientists till today had used the same strategy, we wudnt have dreamt of discovering something like the Higgs-Boson.

Quote:
Point me to a post where I claimed that.
That very post of urs. Go to it again.

Quote:
Sure. I await your response patiently. :)
Thank u!

Indian Cricket Season 2012

Posted: 12 Dec 2012 10:45 AM PST

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymin View Post
So u expected Sehwag to be the captain? He fails miserably as a captain. In fact, he is anyways failing these days. If ur theory was to be believed, then he wudnt have been there in the team. If Dhoni has such a backing, and he has no fear at all, then there was absolutely nothing to stop him from sacking 2 non-performing players, who r falling prey to same old mistakes, and failing to learn from it.

Dhoni is supposed to be a keeper first and then a batsman. If he fails as a batsman, u still have an excellent keeper in him. But with Sehwag & Gambhir - without their batting - they are liabilities on the team.
How do you conclude that Sehwag fails miserably as a captain? Has he been given test captaincy for a continuous period, even two consecutive tests? Without testing I wonder how do you decide.

And secondly, it is simply not at all easy for Dhoni to drop Sehwag. Sehwag isn't performing as bad as he is portrayed, and thus the hesitant Dhoni. Even in the ongoing series Sehwag averages 42-43, which is low by his personal standards but still not bad at all. Even in the tour to Australia, he was the only player along with Sachin and Virat to have two 50+ scores in the series. And the kind of reputation Sehwag has gained since 2008-10 (2010 especially) doesn't make it easy for anyone to drop him. But still the ease with which Dhoni keeps Sehwag out (against Aus in T20 WC, out of the Asia Cup, out of the upcoming T20 series) is baffling. It's not surprising though because everyone knows that Dhoni has a strong backing.